Share this article

Coinbase CEO Suggests Exchange Won't Censor Transactions on Ethereum

Brian Armstrong expressed his preference not to censor transactions to and from sanctioned addresses after the blockchain's transition to proof-of-stake.

Crypto exchange Coinbase (COIN) would rather quit the Ethereum staking business than censor the network to comply with sanctions, CEO Brian Armstrong suggested in a tweet on Wednesday.

On Twitter, Ethereum developer Lefteris Karapetsas asked Coinbase, Kraken and other centralized exchanges what they would do should the U.S. government demand that they comply with sanctions and block transactions related to blacklisted Ethereum addresses. The question has become a hot topic in the crypto community after last week's sanctioning of Tornado Cash, a crypto mixing service.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Don't miss another story.Subscribe to the Crypto Daybook Americas Newsletter today. See all newsletters

Centralized exchanges are among the biggest validators on Ethereum's proof-of-stake (PoS) chain, which is now in a testing mode but soon will become the main network as the platform's developers are planning to abandon the current proof-of-work (PoW) consensus mechanism.

Karapetsas tweeted on Sunday:

"If regulators ask you to censor at the #ethereum protocol level with your validators will you:

Three days later, Armstrong replied:

"It's a hypothetical we hopefully won't actually face. But if we did we'd go with B i think. Got to focus on the bigger picture. There may be some better option (C) or a legal challenge as well that could help reach a better outcome."

Armstrong also voiced support for Tornado Cash developer Alexey Pertsev who was arrested in the Netherlands last week. The Coinbase CEO tweeted that "no developer should be arrested for publishing open source software, even if that software is used by bad actors.".

But whatever he thinks about sanctioning open-source technology, "hopefully obvious point: we will always follow the law," Armstrong said.

Read more: Tornado Cash Fallout: Can Ethereum Be Censored?

In proof-of-stake blockchains, validators lock up, or stake, their tokens in a smart contract as a guarantee they will behave honestly. For correct validation, they are rewarded with new tokens. If they fail to validate properly, their stake can be "slashed" by the protocol.

Some centralized exchanges, which already hold their users' tokens, also offer to stake clients' ETH for them within a larger staking pool for a share in the staking rewards. Coinbase, for one, will benefit greatly from its staking business after Ethereum switches to PoS, J.P. Morgan said.

However, recent efforts by governments to control even decentralized cryptocurrency projects and enforce sanctions, including the Dutch police's arrest of Pertsev, signal a potential hard choice for exchanges: to impose sanctions on the protocol level or forfeit their staking profits.

Eric Wall, chief investment officer at Arcane Assets, believes the community must force centralized exchanges to quit staking altogether, before it's too late.

"Make Coinbase, Kraken, Bitcoin Suisse etc. understand that complying with OFAC is not an option. It will result in slashed stakes for all their customers and the end of their business. Make them unstake now if they don't plan to uphold censorship resistance," Wall tweeted, referring to the Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control.


Anna Baydakova

Anna writes about blockchain projects and regulation with a special focus on Eastern Europe and Russia. She is especially excited about stories on privacy, cybercrime, sanctions policies and censorship resistance of decentralized technologies. She graduated from the Saint Petersburg State University and the Higher School of Economics in Russia and got her Master's degree at Columbia Journalism School in New York City. She joined CoinDesk after years of writing for various Russian media, including the leading political outlet Novaya Gazeta. Anna owns BTC and an NFT of sentimental value.

Anna Baydakova