- Back to menuPrices
- Back to menuResearch
- Back to menu
- Back to menu
- Back to menu
- Back to menuResearch
Senator Who Wrote Controversial Crypto Tax Rule Proposes Modest Revision
The amendment excludes only proof-of-work mining, or the selling of hardware or software that gives individuals control of private keys to access digital assets.

Senators Mark Warner (D-Va.) and Rob Portman (R-Ohio) submitted a competing amendment on Thursday to an earlier amendment to the Senate infrastructure bill's cryptocurrency provision.
- The amendment, a copy of which was obtained by CoinDesk, is limited in scope, excluding only proof-of-work mining, or the selling of hardware or software that permits individuals to control private keys that provide access to digital assets.
- In a tweet Thursday evening, Jerry Brito, the executive director of the Washington, D.C.-based think tank Coin Center, called the amendment "disastrous." He added: "And it does nothing for software devs. Ridiculous!"
- The crypto-specific provision would raise $28 billion toward $1 trillion in infrastructure improvements but has been contentious, briefly holding up the entire infrastructure bill.
- Senators Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.) and Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) proposed their amendment earlier Thursday to ensure miners, node operators, developers and other non-custodial crypto industry participants are exempt from the crypto tax reporting provision.
- The Biden administration formally supported what it called the "compromise" in a statement shared on Twitter late Thursday and attributed to White House Deputy Press Secretary Andrew Bates.
- Wyden tweeted that the competing amendment "provides a government-sanctioned safe harbor for the most climate-damaging form of crypto tech, called proof-of-work. It would be a mistake for the climate and for innovation to advance this amendment."
- Similarly, Lummis tweeted, "Our amendment protects miners as well as hardware and software developers. The other does not. The choice is clear."
Wow. Sen. Warner and Portman are proposing a last minute amendment competing with the Wyden-Lummis-Toomey amendment. It is a disastrous. It only excludes proof-of-work mining. And it does nothing for software devs. Ridiculous!
— Jerry Brito (@jerrybrito) August 5, 2021
Here is all it excludes: pic.twitter.com/FA7K6NU2s0
UPDATE (Aug. 6, 2021, 02:48 UTC): Adds White House formally supporting the Warner-Portman-Sinema amendment and Wyden's response.
James Rubin
James Rubin was CoinDesk's Co-Managing Editor, Markets team based on the West Coast. He has written and edited for the Milken Institute, TheStreet.com and the Economist Intelligence Unit, among other organizations. He is also the co-author of the Urban Cyclist's Survival Guide. He owns a small amount of bitcoin.
