Share this article
BTC
$94,700.02
+
1.52%ETH
$1,797.67
+
1.61%USDT
$1.0003
-
0.01%XRP
$2.1937
+
0.43%BNB
$602.17
-
0.64%SOL
$151.18
-
0.61%USDC
$0.9998
-
0.02%DOGE
$0.1859
+
3.03%ADA
$0.7201
+
0.68%TRX
$0.2444
+
0.40%SUI
$3.6192
+
4.64%LINK
$15.07
+
0.59%AVAX
$22.46
+
1.35%XLM
$0.2911
+
4.60%SHIB
$0.0₄1463
+
5.37%LEO
$9.0647
-
1.99%HBAR
$0.1960
+
4.48%TON
$3.2254
+
0.22%BCH
$373.98
+
3.43%LTC
$87.18
+
3.77%Sign Up
- Back to menuPrices
- Back to menuResearch
- Back to menuConsensus
- Back to menu
- Back to menu
- Back to menu
- Back to menuWebinars & Events
E-Gold Claims US Officials Buried Key Report in 2008 Landmark Crypto Ruling
A court filing alleges federal government suppression of an OFR review led to crypto businesses being defined as money transmitters.

A defunct digital currency project that was a precursor to bitcoin has claimed the U.S. government suppressed crucial evidence in a 2008 landmark case that has since shaped the cryptocurrency industry.
- E-Gold's former directors filed a petition Tuesday for a writ of coram nobis – in which the court changes the original judgment upon discovery of a fundamental error – at the District of Columbia court.
- Founded in 1996, E-Gold allowed users to trade digital units backed by precious metals. At its peak, the company held around $85 million in gold.
- The U.S. government charged E-Gold with being an unlicensed money transmitter in 2007 and the project's directors pleaded guilty in 2008.
- The ex-directors now claim in court the federal government unlawfully concealed a 2006 review from Florida's Office for Financial Regulation (OFR) so it "could make an example" of E-Gold.
- Per the filing, the OFR review said E-Gold did not count as a money transmitter because the gold-based asset was closer to a commodity than a fiat currency under state law.
- E-Gold's former directors claim the court's judgment would have been substantially different had they been allowed access to the OFR review
- The E-Gold case effectively extended the definition of "money transmitter" in the U.S. to include any system that stored and transferred value.
- Many crypto businesses subsequently have had to be regulated as money transmitters in individual states if they want to operate legally in the U.S.
See the full filing below:
See also: Lessons From the First Digital Gold Boom
Paddy Baker
Paddy Baker is a London-based cryptocurrency reporter. He was previously senior journalist at Crypto Briefing.
Paddy holds positions in BTC and ETH, as well as smaller amounts of LTC, ZIL, NEO, BNB and BSV.
