Share this article
BTC
$83,671.03
-
1.09%ETH
$1,816.35
-
0.74%USDT
$0.9996
-
0.02%XRP
$2.1353
+
1.73%BNB
$596.53
-
0.30%SOL
$121.40
+
1.39%USDC
$0.9999
+
0.00%DOGE
$0.1698
+
1.54%ADA
$0.6613
+
0.01%TRX
$0.2366
-
0.93%LINK
$12.96
-
1.22%LEO
$8.9380
-
4.55%TON
$3.2897
-
7.57%XLM
$0.2556
-
2.93%AVAX
$18.26
-
1.81%SUI
$2.2506
-
0.85%SHIB
$0.0₄1238
-
0.73%HBAR
$0.1626
-
1.84%LTC
$83.84
-
1.24%OM
$6.2447
-
1.11%Sign Up
- Back to menuPrices
- Back to menuResearch
- Back to menu
- Back to menu
- Back to menu
- Back to menuResearch
E-Gold Claims US Officials Buried Key Report in 2008 Landmark Crypto Ruling
A court filing alleges federal government suppression of an OFR review led to crypto businesses being defined as money transmitters.

A defunct digital currency project that was a precursor to bitcoin has claimed the U.S. government suppressed crucial evidence in a 2008 landmark case that has since shaped the cryptocurrency industry.
- E-Gold's former directors filed a petition Tuesday for a writ of coram nobis – in which the court changes the original judgment upon discovery of a fundamental error – at the District of Columbia court.
- Founded in 1996, E-Gold allowed users to trade digital units backed by precious metals. At its peak, the company held around $85 million in gold.
- The U.S. government charged E-Gold with being an unlicensed money transmitter in 2007 and the project's directors pleaded guilty in 2008.
- The ex-directors now claim in court the federal government unlawfully concealed a 2006 review from Florida's Office for Financial Regulation (OFR) so it "could make an example" of E-Gold.
- Per the filing, the OFR review said E-Gold did not count as a money transmitter because the gold-based asset was closer to a commodity than a fiat currency under state law.
- E-Gold's former directors claim the court's judgment would have been substantially different had they been allowed access to the OFR review
- The E-Gold case effectively extended the definition of "money transmitter" in the U.S. to include any system that stored and transferred value.
- Many crypto businesses subsequently have had to be regulated as money transmitters in individual states if they want to operate legally in the U.S.
See the full filing below:
See also: Lessons From the First Digital Gold Boom
Paddy Baker
Paddy Baker is a London-based cryptocurrency reporter. He was previously senior journalist at Crypto Briefing. Paddy holds positions in BTC and ETH, as well as smaller amounts of LTC, ZIL, NEO, BNB and BSV.
