Share this article
BTC
$83,004.13
-
1.22%ETH
$1,792.32
-
1.47%USDT
$0.9999
+
0.03%XRP
$2.1339
-
0.17%BNB
$591.25
-
1.13%SOL
$119.22
-
3.33%USDC
$1.0003
+
0.03%DOGE
$0.1678
-
2.50%ADA
$0.6490
-
2.04%TRX
$0.2375
-
0.64%LEO
$9.0784
-
4.73%LINK
$12.66
-
2.26%TON
$3.2485
-
4.91%XLM
$0.2506
-
3.73%AVAX
$17.75
-
2.38%SHIB
$0.0₄1230
-
0.12%SUI
$2.1949
-
3.37%HBAR
$0.1610
-
1.68%LTC
$82.09
-
2.62%OM
$6.2507
-
0.28%Sign Up
- Back to menuPrices
- Back to menuResearch
- Back to menu
- Back to menu
- Back to menu
- Back to menuResearch
E-Gold Claims US Officials Buried Key Report in 2008 Landmark Crypto Ruling
A court filing alleges federal government suppression of an OFR review led to crypto businesses being defined as money transmitters.

A defunct digital currency project that was a precursor to bitcoin has claimed the U.S. government suppressed crucial evidence in a 2008 landmark case that has since shaped the cryptocurrency industry.
- E-Gold's former directors filed a petition Tuesday for a writ of coram nobis – in which the court changes the original judgment upon discovery of a fundamental error – at the District of Columbia court.
- Founded in 1996, E-Gold allowed users to trade digital units backed by precious metals. At its peak, the company held around $85 million in gold.
- The U.S. government charged E-Gold with being an unlicensed money transmitter in 2007 and the project's directors pleaded guilty in 2008.
- The ex-directors now claim in court the federal government unlawfully concealed a 2006 review from Florida's Office for Financial Regulation (OFR) so it "could make an example" of E-Gold.
- Per the filing, the OFR review said E-Gold did not count as a money transmitter because the gold-based asset was closer to a commodity than a fiat currency under state law.
- E-Gold's former directors claim the court's judgment would have been substantially different had they been allowed access to the OFR review
- The E-Gold case effectively extended the definition of "money transmitter" in the U.S. to include any system that stored and transferred value.
- Many crypto businesses subsequently have had to be regulated as money transmitters in individual states if they want to operate legally in the U.S.
See the full filing below:
See also: Lessons From the First Digital Gold Boom
Paddy Baker
Paddy Baker is a London-based cryptocurrency reporter. He was previously senior journalist at Crypto Briefing. Paddy holds positions in BTC and ETH, as well as smaller amounts of LTC, ZIL, NEO, BNB and BSV.
