- Back to menuPrices
- Back to menuResearch
- Back to menu
- Back to menu
- Back to menu
- Back to menuResearch
Crypto Is a 'Crock'? Twitter Reacts to House ICO Hearing
Despite the overall measured tone of Wednesday's House ICO hearing, a couple lawmakers' comments set Twitter aflame.

Despite the overall measured tone among lawmakers at Wednesday's House subcommittee hearing on initial coin offerings, a few members of the panel made inflammatory statements.
Social media users responded in kind.
The most incendiary comment came from California Rep. Brad Sherman, who called cryptocurrencies a "crock." While some Twitter users merely encouraged him to educate himself on the topic, his incredulity that anyone would need alternatives to the legacy banking system and his warnings about a crypto-funded terror attack drew harsher responses.
@BradSherman with all due respect sir, please do not speak about cryptocurrency again. You obviously know too little about it to make competent statements and you obviously need some history lessons. #ICOsInTheHouse #cryptocurrency
— OG Brain 🧠 (@theBrainium) March 14, 2018
Tagging @BradSherman because I'd rather talk to him than about him. Congressman, your views on cryptocurrencies are outdated & poorly researched. You showed extreme ignorance of both the world economy and the technology behind crypto. You left mid-hearing, why? #ICOsInTheHouse
— Michelle (@FintechRegs) March 14, 2018
Still other users simply found Sherman's ideas about the space amusing.
https://twitter.com/JHoffa9/status/973927231427956741https://twitter.com/SloppyProfits/status/973927383571902465
'A bright light'
At the other end of the spectrum, Minnesota Rep. Tom Emmer, a member of the Congressional Blockchain Caucus, was lauded on crypto Twitter for breaking with his fellow lawmakers with a full-throated defense of the technology.
He argued that Congress should not attempt to regulate a subject it does not understand, and added that “access to capital is something Democrats and Republicans should celebrate.”
https://twitter.com/CryptoGodzilla/status/973965414488264704
Emmer’s statements were so positive that some on Twitter considered granting him the “cryptodaddy” title, which Commodity Futures Trading Commission chairman J. Christopher Giancarlo has held since his own hearing appearance last month.
Notable figures in the industry also weighed in on the hearing, including Stephen Palley of Anderson Kill, who recently started a practice at his firm focused on cleaning up messes in the crypto space.
Palley, who delights in needling blockchain advocates for making fanciful claims, poked fun at Emmer's passionate tone.
OK relax congressman.
— Palley (@stephendpalley) March 14, 2018
Despite the fireworks from Emmer and Sherman, Palley appeared to be generally unimpressed with the hearing:
The Senate hearing was more interesting.
— Palley (@stephendpalley) March 14, 2018
Wednesday's hearing was the third such event in two months, though the conversation in Congress (and on Twitter) is likely to continue.
Rep. Bill Huizenga, the chairman of the subcommittee on capital markets, securities and investment, concluded the hearing by telling the panelists, "I believe that this is probably hello and not goodbye."
Nikhilesh De
Nikhilesh De is CoinDesk's managing editor for global policy and regulation, covering regulators, lawmakers and institutions. When he's not reporting on digital assets and policy, he can be found admiring Amtrak or building LEGO trains. He owns < $50 in BTC and < $20 in ETH. He was named the Association of Cryptocurrency Journalists and Researchers' Journalist of the Year in 2020.
