Regulations


Policy

Le grand tribunal de Ripple WIN néanmoins des eaux troubles sur la question de savoir si XRP est une sécurité méritant une réglementation plus stricte

Dans un quasi-vide de clarté juridique et réglementaire pour la Crypto, les opinions des juges de district sur la question de savoir si un jeton donné est ou non un titre – qui détermine le niveau de réglementation – peuvent varier d'un tribunal à l'autre.

Brad Garlinghouse, CEO of Ripple, speaks at Consensus 2024. (Shutterstock/CoinDesk)

Policy

A grande WIN do tribunal de Ripple, no entanto, turvou as águas sobre se o XRP é uma segurança que merece regulamentação mais rígida

Num quase vácuo de clareza jurídica e regulamentar para a Cripto, as opiniões dos juízes distritais sobre se um determinado token é um valor mobiliário ou não – o que determina o nível de regulamentação – podem variar de tribunal para tribunal.

Brad Garlinghouse, CEO of Ripple, speaks at Consensus 2024. (Shutterstock/CoinDesk)

Policy

La SEC poursuit ConsenSys pour le jalonnement de MetaMask et les allégations des courtiers

La SEC a allégué que MetaMask avait agi en tant que courtier en valeurs mobilières non enregistré et que son service de jalonnement avait violé les lois sur les valeurs mobilières.

Joe Lubin, founder and CEO of Consensys. (Shutterstock/CoinDesk/Suzanne Cordiero)

Policy

SEC processa ConsenSys por piquetagem de MetaMask, alegações de corretor

A SEC alegou que a MetaMask agiu como uma corretora de valores mobiliários não registrada e que seu serviço de staking violava as leis de valores mobiliários.

Joe Lubin, founder and CEO of Consensys. (Shutterstock/CoinDesk/Suzanne Cordiero)

Policy

SEC Sues Consensys Over MetaMask Staking, Broker Allegations

The SEC alleged that MetaMask acted as an unregistered securities broker and that its staking service violated securities laws.

Joe Lubin, founder and CEO of Consensys. (Shutterstock/CoinDesk/Suzanne Cordiero)

Policy

La SEC fa causa a ConsenSys per lo staking di MetaMask e le accuse del broker

La SEC ha affermato che MetaMask ha agito come broker di titoli non registrato e che il suo servizio di staking violava le leggi sui titoli.

Joe Lubin, founder and CEO of Consensys. (Shutterstock/CoinDesk/Suzanne Cordiero)

Policy

SEC подає до суду на ConsenSys через MetaMask Staking, звинувачення брокера

SEC стверджувала, що MetaMask діяв як незареєстрований брокер з цінних паперів і що його сервіс порушував законодавство про цінні папери.

Joe Lubin, founder and CEO of Consensys. (Shutterstock/CoinDesk/Suzanne Cordiero)

Policy

Inihain ng SEC ang ConsenSys Tungkol sa MetaMask Staking, Mga Paratang ng Broker

Inakusahan ng SEC na ang MetaMask ay kumilos bilang isang hindi rehistradong securities broker at ang staking service nito ay lumabag sa mga securities laws.

Joe Lubin, founder and CEO of Consensys. (Shutterstock/CoinDesk/Suzanne Cordiero)

Policy

La SEC demanda a ConsenSys por la apuesta de MetaMask y las acusaciones de los corredores

La SEC alegó que MetaMask actuó como un corredor de valores no registrado y que su servicio de apuestas violaba las leyes de valores.

Joe Lubin, founder and CEO of Consensys. (Shutterstock/CoinDesk/Suzanne Cordiero)

Policy

SEC подает в суд на ConsenSys из-за ставок MetaMask и обвинений брокеров

Комиссия по ценным бумагам и биржам (SEC) заявила, что MetaMask действовала как незарегистрированный брокер по ценным бумагам и что ее служба ставок нарушала законы о ценных бумагах.

Joe Lubin, founder and CEO of Consensys. (Shutterstock/CoinDesk/Suzanne Cordiero)