BTC
$106,853.63
-
0.45%
ETH
$2,647.95
+
0.32%
USDT
$1.0001
+
0.00%
XRP
$2.2822
+
0.89%
BNB
$679.83
-
0.61%
SOL
$169.53
-
0.89%
USDC
$0.9998
+
0.02%
DOGE
$0.2196
-
0.29%
ADA
$0.7375
-
1.17%
TRX
$0.2763
+
0.15%
SUI
$3.5673
-
0.12%
HYPE
$31.88
-
7.26%
LINK
$15.37
-
0.85%
AVAX
$22.81
-
1.36%
XLM
$0.2834
-
0.02%
TON
$3.3958
+
0.80%
LEO
$9.0674
+
0.06%
SHIB
$0.0₄1416
-
0.05%
BCH
$411.90
+
0.73%
HBAR
$0.1818
-
1.28%
Logo
  • News
  • Prices
  • Data
  • Indices
  • Research
  • Events
  • Sponsored
  • Sign In
  • Sign Up
Tech
Share this article
X iconX (Twitter)LinkedInFacebookEmail

Arbitrum Voters Polarized Over 'Research' Pitch With $2M Price Tag

Proposed coalition of professional researchers could help "accelerate decision-making" at the Ethereum layer-2 project, but complaints have surfaced over the cost and potential conflicts of interest.

By Sam Kessler|Edited by Bradley Keoun
Updated Nov 9, 2023, 5:25 p.m. Published Nov 8, 2023, 9:19 p.m.
Lybra Finance launched its version 2 test network on Arbitrum Wednesday morning. (Getty Images)
Some Arbitrum community members have argued that the proposed "coalition" for pro research is getting too sweet of a deal. (Getty Images)
  • Cost is "more than I pay for Harvard lawyers," one commenter wrote.
  • Based on early results of "temperature check" vote, opinions are pretty evenly divided.
  • The episode offers a fresh example of how blockchain pioneers are struggling to iron out the nettlesome challenge of decentralized governance.

In March, Arbitrum, the biggest layer-2 blockchain network atop Ethereum with about $2 billion of deposits, pushed to decentralize its governance – distributing tokens to holders who would get a say in deciding the project's strategy and tactics with votes, via a "decentralized autonomous organization" known as Arbitrum DAO.

But a new proposal to professionalize the project's research efforts – by allocating more than $2 million worth of digital tokens to an "Arbitrum Coalition" proposed by the research arm of Blockworks, a crypto media firm – is polarizing the community and generating complaints over the cost and potential conflicts of interest.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Don't miss another story.Subscribe to the The Protocol Newsletter today. See all newsletters
By signing up, you will receive emails about CoinDesk products and you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Currently, the project's research is contributed and aggregated in a community forum, mostly by volunteers.

But the coalition proposal has been met with discord in these forums, with the debate hitting on a key tension at the core of all DAOs: how to reconcile "decentralized" decision-making with the need for expert guidance.

A key complaint is that there could be conflicts of interest among members of the research coalition. The professional contributors would include Blockworks Research; Gauntlet, a crypto-centric risk and financial advisory firm; and Trail of Bits, a cybersecurity company. An additional organization will be elected to serve as a "DAO Advocate" and act as a "referee between the DAO and the coalition" under the proposal.

"Having the same parties review and provide opinions on proposals, cover those proposals publicly via Media Networks, vote on proposals, review the security concerns of a proposal, and then execute the Arbitrum network upgrades is fundamentally lacking separation of powers," wrote one commenter. The person added that proposed members of the coalition also comprise a large percentage of overall ARB votes.

The proposal also struck a nerve with some community members who took issue with the proposed cost of the new venture: $2 million for a year-long trial run.

A "temperature check" poll on the proposal started on Nov. 3 and ends Nov. 10; the informal tally will help determine whether the proposal should be taken to an official Arbitrum DAO vote. While some large DAO voters still have yet to weigh in, the proposal is currently set to pass its simple-majority threshold, albeit by a thin margin: 52% have voted in favor of the coalition's funding and 46% against it.

Arbitrum DAO

Arbitrum switched to a DAO-based governance structure in March when it first launched the ARB token and established the Arbitrum Foundation – a non-profit tasked with supporting the development of the Arbitrum network, which helps facilitate faster and cheaper transactions on Ethereum.

The guiding role of a DAO like Arbitrum's is to allow a widely distributed community of people – in this case, Arbitrum's ARB token-holders – to decide how a protocol is developed and governed.

While Arbitrum's shift to decentralized governance has been official for more than six months, the Arbitrum Foundation and Offchain Labs (the firm that built Arbitrum) continue to play a crucial role in the ecosystem. Their outsized influence can be viewed as a necessary byproduct of how DAOs work: It can be hard to coordinate across a far-flung group of DAO members with varying levels of engagement and expertise.

"Arbitrum’s impressive decentralization demonstrates that the DAO can’t rely on single entities such as Offchain Labs or the Arbitrum Foundation," Blockworks Research wrote in its proposal.

The research coalition was pitched by Blockworks Research as a way to "accelerate" decision-making on Arbitrum – offloading certain research and diligence responsibilities to a trusted group of expert stakeholders. The coalition described in the proposal is also supposed to help balance power further in favor of the DAO.

Arbitrum Community Responds

In authoring the proposal, Blockworks Research wrote that it was motivated by the fact that the Arbitrum Forum "includes many worthwhile suggestions, but often lacks the required research, coordination, design, and risk assessment to move forward optimally." (Disclaimer: Blockworks competes with CoinDesk in the crypto media and events space.)

In response to a forum comment around concerns that the new coalition could act as a "centralizing force," Blockworks Research responded that "The Coalition does not intend to influence or persuade community members to vote in any direction," adding that the goal would be to "provide objective tools and reports to help delegates and community members make more informed decisions more efficiently."

The company specified in the proposal that members of the coalition could be removed or changed after serving a 12-month term.

The projected yearly cost for the research coalition would total $2.2 million worth of ARB, Arbitrum’s native token – funds that would come directly out of the Arbitrum DAO treasury. Some of the more heated debate on the proposal was around how these funds would be allocated.

'More than I pay for Harvard lawyers'

According to a proposed breakdown of costs, Trail of Bits would receive $800,000 for an engineer to review proposals for 32 weeks over the course of a year. Gauntlet, meanwhile, requested $327,000 for "15 quantitative researcher weeks," and Blockworks requested $780,000 "for a minimum 13 analyst weeks per quarter."

"Can the organizations involved demonstrate their time is worth $650-$1500/ hour?" wrote one commenter on Arbitrum's governance forum. "That seems exorbitant … as in 'more than I pay for Harvard lawyers' exorbitant, literally."

As to concerns around this proposed payment plan, Blockworks Research analyst Sam Martin told CoinDesk via email that Blockworks "specifically proposed a not-to-exceed price to eliminate the possibility of overspend on the DAO," adding that "the DAO will have our entire team at its disposal which spans in expertise with a wide array of skills."

"Our commitment to the DAO and seeing it succeed is rather obvious at this point through our unpaid contributions made thus far," Martin said in the email.

ArbitrumDAODao governanceGauntlet
Sam Kessler

Sam is CoinDesk's deputy managing editor for tech and protocols. His reporting is focused on decentralized technology, infrastructure and governance. Sam holds a computer science degree from Harvard University, where he led the Harvard Political Review. He has a background in the technology industry and owns some ETH and BTC. Sam was part of the team that won a 2023 Gerald Loeb Award for CoinDesk's coverage of Sam Bankman-Fried and the FTX collapse.

X icon
CoinDesk News Image
Latest Crypto News
Article image

Bitcoin Whales Seem to Be Calling a Top as BTC Price Consolidates

2 hours ago

Bitcoin (BTC) price on May 19 (CoinDesk)

Bitcoin Climbs to $105K; Crypto ETF Issuer Sees 35% Upside

2 hours ago

Breaking News

Breaking New test

5 hours ago

FastNews (CoinDesk)

Fast News test

5 hours ago

Article image

Ethereum Surges 4% on Massive Volume as Institutional Interest Grows.

May 27, 2025

Article image

test research article

May 22, 2025

Top Stories
SHIB-USD 1-month chart shows 24.57% gain ending at $0.00004146 on May 15

Shiba Inu (SHIB) Price Drops 7% in 24 Hours but Remains Up 25% Over the Past Month

May 15, 2025

(CJ/Unsplash)

XRP Futures Start Trading on CME

May 19, 2025

Tax sign (The New York Public Library/Unsplash)

Crypto Capital Gains and Tax Rates 2022

Nov 14, 2022

Swap

Atomic Swaps: What Are They & How Do They Work?

Jan 11, 2024

Pancakes (Mae Mu/Unsplash)

What Is PancakeSwap? Here’s How to Start Using It

Apr 21, 2022

Futures Open Interest, CME (Glassnode)

Recent Inflows Into Spot Bitcoin ETFs Could Be Purely Directional Plays: Van Straten

Dec 4, 2024

Only 2 articles remaining this month.

Sign up for free

About

  • About Us
  • Masthead
  • Careers
  • CoinDesk News
  • Crypto API Documentation

Contact

  • Contact Us
  • Accessibility
  • Advertise
  • Sitemap
  • System Status
DISCLOSURE & POLICES
CoinDesk is an award-winning media outlet that covers the cryptocurrency industry. Its journalists abide by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk has adopted a set of principles aimed at ensuring the integrity, editorial independence and freedom from bias of its publications. CoinDesk is part of the Bullish group, which owns and invests in digital asset businesses and digital assets. CoinDesk employees, including journalists, may receive Bullish group equity-based compensation. Bullish was incubated by technology investor Block.one.
EthicsPrivacyTerms of UseCookie SettingsDo Not Sell My Info

© 2025 CoinDesk, Inc.
X icon
Sign Up
  • News
    Back to menu
    News
    • Markets
    • Finance
    • Tech
    • Policy
    • Focus
  • Prices
    Back to menu
    Prices
    • Data
      Back to menu
      Data
      • Trade Data
      • Derivatives
      • Order Book Data
      • On-Chain Data
      • API
      • Research & Insights
      • Data Catalogue
      • AI & Machine Learning
    • Indices
      Back to menu
      Indices
      • Multi-Asset Indices
      • Reference Rates
      • Strategies and Services
      • API
      • Insights & Announcements
      • Documentation & Governance
    • Research
      Back to menu
      Research
      • Events
        Back to menu
        Events
        • Consensus Hong Kong
        • Consensus 2026
        • CoinDesk: Policy & Regulation
      • Sponsored
        Back to menu
        Sponsored
        • Thought Leadership
        • Press Releases
        • CoinW
        • MEXC
        • Phemex
        • Advertise
      • Videos
        Back to menu
        Videos
        • CoinDesk Daily
        • Shorts
        • Editor's Picks
      • Podcasts
        Back to menu
        Podcasts
        • CoinDesk Podcast Network
        • Markets Daily
        • Gen C
        • Unchained with Laura Shin
        • The Mining Pod
      • Newsletters
        Back to menu
        Newsletters
        • The Node
        • Crypto Daybook Americas
        • State of Crypto
        • Crypto Long & Short
        • Crypto for Advisors
      • Webinars & Events
        Back to menu
        Webinars & Events
        • Consensus 2025
        • Policy & Regulation Conference
      Select Language
      English enEspañol esFilipino filFrançais frItaliano itPortuguês pt-brРусский ruУкраїнська uk