The Tether Killer? A True Stablecoin Would Enhance Banking and Crypto
A U.S. dollar pegged stablecoin backed only by cash in a bank could help expand the money supply without causing inflation and improve the banking sector, attorney Daniel Wheeler argues.

On Tuesday, ratings agency S&P published a report examining eight of the leading stablecoins, finding many are deficient.
Arguably, a pegged U.S. dollar stablecoin would not only safely increase the money supply, but actually improve the money supply. In fact, it would enhance U.S. economic growth by splitting our money supply in two.
One part – the pegged stablecoin – would be used to transact faster and cheaper. The other part – the U.S. dollars held in bank accounts – would be used to lower the cost of borrowing USD.
Daniel Wheeler (www.thefintech.lawyer) is an entrepreneur and a lawyer who advises banks, fintechs, and crypto startups.
Only a specific kind of stablecoin would yield these economic benefits. Any coin that promises “yield,” “earnings” or “dividends” is presumably a security and any transaction with that coin would trigger capital gains tax.
Even if the stablecoin was structured like Tether (which S&P negatively assessed) with no yield promised to holders, there likely would be little benefit to the U.S. money supply and economy if the stablecoin's portfolio of assets was not strictly limited to dollars in a bank account.
The serious, potentially fatal flaw with a stablecoin like Tether is the potential for a “run on the bank.” Any stablecoin that invests in anything other than U.S. dollars in a bank account cannot assure its holders that they can redeem their stablecoin at any time, all at once, and receive 100% of the face value of the stablecoin.
A coin like Tether depends upon the black swan event never happening. A true stablecoin can be sold and redeemed for exactly $1 and is assumed to never fluctuate in value. It does not pay yield and does not appreciate. There is no reason to “hodl” such a stablecoin.
However, it is assumed that stablecoins are faster and easier to transact with and more valuable for transactions than fiat currency. This superior functionality would drive demand, meaning a stablecoin issuer/sponsor could profitably operate the stablecoin by retaining the fiat currency yield paid by the custodian bank for the U.S. dollar deposits.
At the same time, a true stablecoin would not chase the same goods and services as fiat currency because it would be high velocity money only used to transact. The dollar deposits held in a bank account to back the stablecoin would be stable long-term deposits that would allow the bank to lend at lower rates.
Therefore, a true pegged stablecoin would (1) expand the money supply without causing inflation and (2) lower the cost of borrowing fiat currency.
Such a stablecoin presents none of the problems of a central bank digital currency (CBDC). It fits easily into existing law, does not harm the banking system and prevents the government from using currency as a weapon of surveillance and control.
Note: The views expressed in this column are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of CoinDesk, Inc. or its owners and affiliates.
Di più per voi
Exchange Review - March 2025

CoinDesk Data's monthly Exchange Review captures the key developments within the cryptocurrency exchange market. The report includes analyses that relate to exchange volumes, crypto derivatives trading, market segmentation by fees, fiat trading, and more.
Cosa sapere:
Trading activity softened in March as market uncertainty grew amid escalating tariff tensions between the U.S. and global trading partners. Centralized exchanges recorded their lowest combined trading volume since October, declining 6.24% to $6.79tn. This marked the third consecutive monthly decline across both market segments, with spot trading volume falling 14.1% to $1.98tn and derivatives trading slipping 2.56% to $4.81tn.
- Trading Volumes Decline for Third Consecutive Month: Combined spot and derivatives trading volume on centralized exchanges fell by 6.24% to $6.79tn in March 2025, reaching the lowest level since October. Both spot and derivatives markets recorded their third consecutive monthly decline, falling 14.1% and 2.56% to $1.98tn and $4.81tn respectively.
- Institutional Crypto Trading Volume on CME Falls 23.5%: In March, total derivatives trading volume on the CME exchange fell by 23.5% to $175bn, the lowest monthly volume since October 2024. CME's market share among derivatives exchanges dropped from 4.63% to 3.64%, suggesting declining institutional interest amid current macroeconomic conditions.
- Bybit Spot Market Share Slides in March: Spot trading volume on Bybit fell by 52.1% to $81.1bn in March, coinciding with decreased trading activity following the hack of the exchange's cold wallets in February. Bybit's spot market share dropped from 7.35% to 4.10%, its lowest since July 2023.
Higit pang Para sa Iyo
Another article is created to test tags being added to image overlays

Dek: Another article is created to test tags being added to image overlays
Ano ang dapat malaman:
- Ethena's USDe becomes fifth stablecoin to surpass $10 billion market cap in just 609 days, while Tether's dominance continues to slip.